Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Integrate displayModel branch in to NVDA #643

Closed
nvaccessAuto opened this issue May 10, 2010 · 6 comments
Closed

Integrate displayModel branch in to NVDA #643

nvaccessAuto opened this issue May 10, 2010 · 6 comments
Assignees
@michaelDCurran
Labels
task
Milestone
2010.2

Comments

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link

Reported by mdcurran on 2010-05-10 07:05
After the displayModel branch of NVDA is stable enough it should be merged in to main. As many other tickets rely on this happening, this ticket can act as a meta ticket so that we can keep track of all the other ones. Then we can reassess all ot them once this ticket has been closed.

Blocking #58, #151, #200, #582, #605
@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

Comment by mdcurran on 2010-05-10 07:15
(In #151) All should be solved by using displayModel.

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

Comment by mdcurran on 2010-05-10 07:35
(In #200) Implemented in displayModel,3464.1.10
Once displayModel branch is merged this can be closed.

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

Comment by mdcurran on 2010-05-10 07:37
(In #605) Works great with displayModel branch. Once merged this ticket can be closed.

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

Comment 5 by jteh on 2010-05-10 10:32
I'm confused about the relationship between this ticket and #40...

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

Comment 6 by mdcurran on 2010-05-10 10:54
Slightly my mystake -- I didn't realize (or I forgot) that ticket 40 had quite a few comments related to the new display model -- I only thought it really contained my first new code intro comment.
I also didn't realize that all those display related tickets were already blocking 40. I'll learn to check next time :)
However, I think I'd prefer to keep it this way for now anyway as really the task is to merge displayModel, and all those tickets can automatically be closed once that happens, we're not really talking about major new features having to be implemented now.
But yeah, I could have saved myself the trouble if I'd looked :)

@nvaccessAuto
Copy link
Author

Comment 8 by jteh on 2010-05-13 04:03
Done in c90061b.
Changes:
State: closed

@nvaccessAuto nvaccessAuto added this to the 2010.2 milestone Nov 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michaelDCurran michaelDCurran

Labels
task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2010.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@michaelDCurran @nvaccessAuto