New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce object, document and screen review modes #2996
Comments
Comment 1 by jteh on 2013-02-14 09:45
|
Comment 2 by halim on 2013-02-14 14:23
Maybe speech users would also find an automatic switching useful. |
Comment 3 by aliminator (in reply to comment description) on 2013-03-01 13:29
Ok. Whereby the amount of information should be configurable for each device type (speech, braille) independently. This mode is implicitly the default one if element is selected.
When this is the case the flat review mode should be activated implicitly. A trigger for this could be pressing keys up/down on the braille device or using appropiate gestures on the keyboard. |
Comment 4 by jteh on 2013-03-02 12:44 |
Comment 5 by ateu on 2013-03-26 16:32 I think it would be nicer if we can obtain the object's names with flat review, like orca does. Is this possible? Thanks |
Comment 6 by mdcurran on 2013-06-04 04:12 |
Comment 7 by jteh on 2013-06-26 03:00 |
Comment 8 by mdcurran on 2013-06-26 05:46 |
Comment 9 by aliminator on 2013-07-02 15:10 What about displaying the control types for Braille when it is tethered to Review and Screen Review is activated? |
Comment 10 by jteh on 2013-07-03 01:44 |
Comment 11 by Michael Curran <mick@... on 2013-07-17 04:05
Changes:
|
Comment 12 by jteh on 2013-07-17 05:05 |
Comment 13 by aliminator on 2013-08-12 14:01 |
Comment 14 by ondrosik on 2013-08-12 14:08 |
Reported by jteh on 2013-02-14 09:42
The way we currently handle document/screen review is confusing for some users. It also makes object navigation and document/screen review tedious to use simultaneously; e.g. navigating to an object and moving to that position in document/screen review or vice versa.
An alternative (perhaps better) approach is to separate review into three moes:
Advantages:
can we come up with a better term than "review mode"? "Review scope" makes more sense, but might be confusing for many users. Or is it okay?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: